In the What's Familiar theme I have been on for a week or so, I present FSLR from last Friday, Aug 21st.
-
The chart on the left is clean for comparison. The chart on the right shows some common signals I am looking for to further my understanding of high-ADR stock behavior. The bold white horizontal lines are the reversal points of the major trends of the day.
First, I look for the big momo candles which end at the high or low of the candle as an indicator of reversal. The white arrows are two examples of this... further, each reversal was accompanied by a gap-up.
Second, precursors to break up or break down: The magenta colored lines with a white "X" (also the two white lines pointing to 11:05&11:10; I forgot to change the color to magenta) in the chart indicate a doji, a hammer, or a wide price range candle with a relatively small open/close range.
Third, my old favorite, the high volume spike and my new favorite, the low-volume indicator. These are marked by the thin white lines dropping down to the corresponding volume level (some of which are marked in the volume area by the white "X".
As I look at the chart now, I see more of these signals which I did not mark.
-
I'm closing this down and not trading today. The weather is fine and I am going to wax the Harley! Then, it is "Downeast" Maine and hopefully Canada!
Best to you all for a good week!
Documenting the Journey From Bluecollar Guy Doing a Bluecollar Job to Trading the Markets for a Living
"A man is not finished when he is defeated. He is finished when he quits."
Monday, August 31, 2009
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Excerpts from Deel's book, Part II
...continued from prior post
-
"Extrememly volatile stocks will have a massive sell-off once or twice during the trading day. This intraday sell-off can become an excellent point at which to short the stock, making this strong downward move a bullish trend you will want to take advantage of. When this trend begins to correct, a climax selling reversal can be played by taking a profit on your short position and, at the right moment, going long (buying the stock). "
He then goes on to illustrate the point with a figure/diagram.
This is exactly what Scott Farnham does every day with remarkable genius. He plays each move of high-ADR stocks and ETF 's in succession.
-
I think there are some great tips in this book and it would be helpful to the day-trader as well as the swing-trader in training. Especially if you favor the momentum-based trading style found at Fear & Greed Day Trader blog.
And for the price of a foot-long lunch combo at Subway(plus shipping), how can you go wrong!
-
"Extrememly volatile stocks will have a massive sell-off once or twice during the trading day. This intraday sell-off can become an excellent point at which to short the stock, making this strong downward move a bullish trend you will want to take advantage of. When this trend begins to correct, a climax selling reversal can be played by taking a profit on your short position and, at the right moment, going long (buying the stock). "
He then goes on to illustrate the point with a figure/diagram.
This is exactly what Scott Farnham does every day with remarkable genius. He plays each move of high-ADR stocks and ETF 's in succession.
-
I think there are some great tips in this book and it would be helpful to the day-trader as well as the swing-trader in training. Especially if you favor the momentum-based trading style found at Fear & Greed Day Trader blog.
And for the price of a foot-long lunch combo at Subway(plus shipping), how can you go wrong!
Excerpts from The Strategic Day Trader, by Robert Deel
I posted a few weeks ago that I had ordered "The Strategic Day Trader" by Robert Deel, from Amazon. From it, I have found some useful nuggets and found, in some part, the basis of Scott Farnham's method of trading. Published in 2000, much of it is dated; written before decimalization, for instance. However, it was well worth the $6 plus shipping that I paid. I have been re-reading my highlighted portions daily and thought these few from Chapter 4 - "A picture is worth a thousand words," might be interesting to some:
-
"An analysis of price movement will show that stocks and markets move in distinctive, identifiable trends. These trends exist in multiple time frames of minutes, hours, weeks, months, even years. The existence of these trends is what high-probability, profitability traders and aggressive investors are seeking to identify."
-
"Great traders identify trend and stay with it until it reverses. They do not abandon trend after it moves up 1/16 or 1/8 of a point. In day trading, for example, trends usually sustain themselves over various time intervals.... During this trend, there could be downward movement in one or two of the price bars, [he uses bar charts, not candlesticks] but the trend will usually keep moving upward or downward until the trend reverses. Because the trend is usually of a longer duration, you have the potential to capture substantial capital in one trade."
-
"Never be fooled into thinking by taking more trades you will make more money. I prefer to take three to five high-probability trades over twenty scalping trades on every occasion. If you think about it, this is just common sense. When it comes to day trading, it has been my experience that logic and common sense are abandoned for emotional trading driven by fear and greed. "
-
"If you look at an individual price bar for a given day, you see the high, low, and open for that day. Most people just see these bits of information and go no further. But as with the magnet, there is an invisible force that surrounds each daily price bar. That invisible force is intraday volatility. Volatility shapes the bar's high-low range, dictates the trend, and influences the other price bars. Each bar has to some degree an influence on the future price movement the next day. Because of this, you need to ascertain the intraday price movement of the previous day. In some cases you might want to observe the intraday movement of the previous five days. This will give you a feel for what traders are doing. For example, you may find intraday support and resistence levels that carry over into the next day."
-
more on next post...
-
"An analysis of price movement will show that stocks and markets move in distinctive, identifiable trends. These trends exist in multiple time frames of minutes, hours, weeks, months, even years. The existence of these trends is what high-probability, profitability traders and aggressive investors are seeking to identify."
-
"Great traders identify trend and stay with it until it reverses. They do not abandon trend after it moves up 1/16 or 1/8 of a point. In day trading, for example, trends usually sustain themselves over various time intervals.... During this trend, there could be downward movement in one or two of the price bars, [he uses bar charts, not candlesticks] but the trend will usually keep moving upward or downward until the trend reverses. Because the trend is usually of a longer duration, you have the potential to capture substantial capital in one trade."
-
"Never be fooled into thinking by taking more trades you will make more money. I prefer to take three to five high-probability trades over twenty scalping trades on every occasion. If you think about it, this is just common sense. When it comes to day trading, it has been my experience that logic and common sense are abandoned for emotional trading driven by fear and greed. "
-
"If you look at an individual price bar for a given day, you see the high, low, and open for that day. Most people just see these bits of information and go no further. But as with the magnet, there is an invisible force that surrounds each daily price bar. That invisible force is intraday volatility. Volatility shapes the bar's high-low range, dictates the trend, and influences the other price bars. Each bar has to some degree an influence on the future price movement the next day. Because of this, you need to ascertain the intraday price movement of the previous day. In some cases you might want to observe the intraday movement of the previous five days. This will give you a feel for what traders are doing. For example, you may find intraday support and resistence levels that carry over into the next day."
-
more on next post...
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Cost of an education...
As a dollars and cents kind of guy who proudly admits to gripping a nickel so hard the buffalo screams (umm, I mean frugal), I have often tried to calculate the costs of educating myself as a trader. I've heard that the education of a trader can be dearly expensive, alluding to those who have blown out their accounts trying to learn this art.
I met with a friend today who saves all his magazines for me to read. It's been a while so there were over two dozen. I quickly discarded the rubbish: Newsweek, Entertainment Weekly, Money, and Kiplingers, to name a few. But among them were my regular favorites: This Old House, Food Channel magazine, Business Week, The New Yorker, Boston Magazine, and Forbes. And in the August 24th issue of Forbes was the annual ranking of Best Colleges.
Because I have a bachelors degree, I often refer to my stock market training as my self-directed masters degree. As such, the costs of masters degrees was particularly interesting to me. For MBAs at the top ten ranked MBA programs out of the list of 50 best programs, out-of-state tuition and fees averaged $96,800. The ten lowest priced programs averaged $48,200. There's no doubt that these are not representative of all MBA programs available. State schools with in-state rates would be cheaper; the University of Southern Maine charges about $21,000 for the 60 credit-hour program. No matter how you slice it, a masters degree is a big financial committment.
What has trading cost me thus far? Down $3800 over 8 months (actually a one day loss), "tuition" is running me about $475 per month on average. If one assumes that a masters is often earned in about 24 months, my "self-directed" masters will cost me $11,400 if I continue on this track.
Yes, I know this is not a carefully considered and well-researched essay. My clumsy point is this: As expensive as trading can be to learn, it still may be the best deal out there. And the best deal of all? We are in charge of the tuition rates we pay.
I met with a friend today who saves all his magazines for me to read. It's been a while so there were over two dozen. I quickly discarded the rubbish: Newsweek, Entertainment Weekly, Money, and Kiplingers, to name a few. But among them were my regular favorites: This Old House, Food Channel magazine, Business Week, The New Yorker, Boston Magazine, and Forbes. And in the August 24th issue of Forbes was the annual ranking of Best Colleges.
Because I have a bachelors degree, I often refer to my stock market training as my self-directed masters degree. As such, the costs of masters degrees was particularly interesting to me. For MBAs at the top ten ranked MBA programs out of the list of 50 best programs, out-of-state tuition and fees averaged $96,800. The ten lowest priced programs averaged $48,200. There's no doubt that these are not representative of all MBA programs available. State schools with in-state rates would be cheaper; the University of Southern Maine charges about $21,000 for the 60 credit-hour program. No matter how you slice it, a masters degree is a big financial committment.
What has trading cost me thus far? Down $3800 over 8 months (actually a one day loss), "tuition" is running me about $475 per month on average. If one assumes that a masters is often earned in about 24 months, my "self-directed" masters will cost me $11,400 if I continue on this track.
Yes, I know this is not a carefully considered and well-researched essay. My clumsy point is this: As expensive as trading can be to learn, it still may be the best deal out there. And the best deal of all? We are in charge of the tuition rates we pay.
Friday, August 28, 2009
August 28th - A bit later...
Here's where it is now. I've been watching it (as well as eating lunch) instead of trading it.
It just closed above the 7 EMA at the 12:35 pm candle at $48.98. An exit on my trade here would have given me a gain of $4830.
However, this is a delayed/late exit. The ideal exit signal would have been at the close of the 12:15pm candle, corresponding to the high volume spike and long tail/wick on the candle. An exit here at $46.60 would have yielded $7,210 in gains. A nice trade...
-
I'm outta here. We're going for a bike ride. Only for the afternoon, though. Bad weather coming in for the week-end so no overnights until next week.
-
Good trading to all. May your endeavors be educationally and financially profitable!
August 28th - Mid-Day
I had been waiting for about 30 minutes for a move in AIG. I always consider the filling of an opening gap.
The stock is still sinking even after this screen shot so I really missed most of the trade. But I am happy about pegging the breakdown. I looked for the string of closes below the 7 EMA then took it short just before the drop. What I have to learn now is patience... to hold my winners... the stock is at $48.11 right now and if I had held, I'd be up $5700 on this trade so far, instead of only up $554. I sold at what I thought would be a resistence level set by the 9:40 & 9:45 am candles. The stock has not threatened a break of the 7 EMA, the sell signal I am considering adopting.
Ok, looks like a potential reversal candle is forming at 11:55pm... we'll see how it goes.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Upcoming...
Starting tomorrow at noon, I am on vacation until after Labor Day. If the weather is sunny, Mrs. BlueCollar and I are planning a motorcycle trip to the Canadian Maritimes (Nova Scotia). So if, if, if we can get the weather, the blog will also be on vacation. If the weather fails us and we can't ride, I'll probably be spending some time with the markets.
-
Last year, we did a bike trip to Ottawa for Canada Day (great fireworks) and then through Montreal to Quebec for the 400th anniversary of the city. Standing on bleachers under the Chateau Frontenac, it was the best fireworks show I've ever seen, by far. Not to mention, saw Van Halen's final tour-date at the Plains of Abraham before walking down to the fireworks. Finished the trip by getting back to Maine for our USA Independence Day festivities. There's nothing like the freedom and calming effect of riding. It mellows even my Type-A personality...
-
If anyone ever gets the chance, I highly recommend Nova Scotia as a destination. Some of the nicest people you will ever meet. For example, when we were there last in August 2001 with two other couples on bikes, we decided to walk to dinner based on our motel clerk's distance estimate. It turned out to be a long walk... a couple miles each way, and after dark. We met a local couple having their anniversary dinner and I'll be darned if they didn't offer us a ride back! It took two trips and one spouse had to stay at the restaurant while the other drove complete strangers around Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. And they were so gracious about it... wouldn't think of taking a dime for their troubles. Can't imagine that happening anywhere else.
Not to mention some great scenery and the largest tides in the world in the Bay of Fundy. A tide of over 70 feet was recorded in 1869. Now you can amaze your friends with great tide trivia. Don't say you never got anything useful here...ha!
-
Last year, we did a bike trip to Ottawa for Canada Day (great fireworks) and then through Montreal to Quebec for the 400th anniversary of the city. Standing on bleachers under the Chateau Frontenac, it was the best fireworks show I've ever seen, by far. Not to mention, saw Van Halen's final tour-date at the Plains of Abraham before walking down to the fireworks. Finished the trip by getting back to Maine for our USA Independence Day festivities. There's nothing like the freedom and calming effect of riding. It mellows even my Type-A personality...
-
If anyone ever gets the chance, I highly recommend Nova Scotia as a destination. Some of the nicest people you will ever meet. For example, when we were there last in August 2001 with two other couples on bikes, we decided to walk to dinner based on our motel clerk's distance estimate. It turned out to be a long walk... a couple miles each way, and after dark. We met a local couple having their anniversary dinner and I'll be darned if they didn't offer us a ride back! It took two trips and one spouse had to stay at the restaurant while the other drove complete strangers around Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. And they were so gracious about it... wouldn't think of taking a dime for their troubles. Can't imagine that happening anywhere else.
Not to mention some great scenery and the largest tides in the world in the Bay of Fundy. A tide of over 70 feet was recorded in 1869. Now you can amaze your friends with great tide trivia. Don't say you never got anything useful here...ha!
August 27th
Whoa. I was overmatched by AIG today because of the speed. I haven't tried playing something with that much volatility since early spring. For me, a couple lessons from today. First of all, if I had kept my three biggest losses to the stop limit of $400, I would have been down only two dollars today. However, I did escape with gains from a couple trades which I had let go over the stop. So, this is a bit of a distortion too.
I was mesmerized by the speed and unaccustomed to stops as large as was needed on this fast mover. I finally settled on $400 because I remember that amount being in the neighborhood of where FNG had his last fall during the big price movements. I really had no clue as to where to place them without that benchmark.
Second lesson of today was that I was focused on the unrealized gains column on my trading platform and not on the charts. I finally removed the gains and losses data and still found myself searching for it. It's gone for good from my paper-trade account now. I need to focus on price and volume, not gain/loss.
Third lesson was that I was suckered into trying to trade consolidation areas and not waiting for familiar set-ups.
Finally, I did not follow the plan I have been trying to create... I got a good entry long: $47.78 at
2:15 after the 2:10 candle closed above the 7 EMA and price started to rise above both EMA's. But, I got distracted and impatient after about 5 minutes and bolted with a $50 gain. That was a bad move because it was a nice entry into a 30 minute trend of continuous green candles which could have yielded up to $1.97 per share in gains ($1,970 on the 1000 shares). During this run, price did not close below the 7 EMA and only once in the next candle after entry did it drop below my entry price (by only 2 cents). So, the trade was never in jeopardy of stopping out. I just didn't follow my plan. The speed of the movement got into my head.
As a result of bailing on this solid trade, I was trading too much... multi-trading when I should have been managing one trending trade. My losses during this trend timeframe: $-1,521.
So, hypothetically: The true cost of discarding this one trade: Missed gains of up to $1,970 added to the losses of $1,521... the net swing in my returns today was up to $3,491.
Other observations:
I know I mentioned it before, but Speed Kills.
Secondly, I am still in the initial stages of formulating a trading plan; only since last week-end, really. I'm toying with using the 7 & 17 EMA's in it but it needs a lot of thought. For instance, had I stayed in that trend mentioned above, using an exit signal of the "First Close Below 7 EMA" would have been at $48.74, during the large drop at 3:20pm. Ouch! That late an exit would have taken away a huge chunk of the potential gains (although it would have given a prfitable trade). Clearly, other signals have to be considered. Using the High-Volume spike I have relied on in the past as a signal, it would have led to an exit during the 2:35 pm candle. Definitely more profitable than the previously mentioned 7 EMA Cross signal. Although profitable, the High-Volume signal seems premature. I just don't know yet. Eventually, I hope to be able to read momentum and base decisions on it primarily, discarding pre-determined entry/exit points. I really am impatient with myself and need to allot the time to learn this.
This is still really new but has been a necessity for a long time. I never have had a plan, a framework, for trading and certainly never had any semblance of an exit strategy. Mostly, I have operated based on one primary signal; the high-volume reversal of direction.
All of this is a work in progress but I am excited by the possibilities. I just wish I had more time for the research...
I was mesmerized by the speed and unaccustomed to stops as large as was needed on this fast mover. I finally settled on $400 because I remember that amount being in the neighborhood of where FNG had his last fall during the big price movements. I really had no clue as to where to place them without that benchmark.
Second lesson of today was that I was focused on the unrealized gains column on my trading platform and not on the charts. I finally removed the gains and losses data and still found myself searching for it. It's gone for good from my paper-trade account now. I need to focus on price and volume, not gain/loss.
Third lesson was that I was suckered into trying to trade consolidation areas and not waiting for familiar set-ups.
Finally, I did not follow the plan I have been trying to create... I got a good entry long: $47.78 at
2:15 after the 2:10 candle closed above the 7 EMA and price started to rise above both EMA's. But, I got distracted and impatient after about 5 minutes and bolted with a $50 gain. That was a bad move because it was a nice entry into a 30 minute trend of continuous green candles which could have yielded up to $1.97 per share in gains ($1,970 on the 1000 shares). During this run, price did not close below the 7 EMA and only once in the next candle after entry did it drop below my entry price (by only 2 cents). So, the trade was never in jeopardy of stopping out. I just didn't follow my plan. The speed of the movement got into my head.
As a result of bailing on this solid trade, I was trading too much... multi-trading when I should have been managing one trending trade. My losses during this trend timeframe: $-1,521.
So, hypothetically: The true cost of discarding this one trade: Missed gains of up to $1,970 added to the losses of $1,521... the net swing in my returns today was up to $3,491.
Other observations:
I know I mentioned it before, but Speed Kills.
Secondly, I am still in the initial stages of formulating a trading plan; only since last week-end, really. I'm toying with using the 7 & 17 EMA's in it but it needs a lot of thought. For instance, had I stayed in that trend mentioned above, using an exit signal of the "First Close Below 7 EMA" would have been at $48.74, during the large drop at 3:20pm. Ouch! That late an exit would have taken away a huge chunk of the potential gains (although it would have given a prfitable trade). Clearly, other signals have to be considered. Using the High-Volume spike I have relied on in the past as a signal, it would have led to an exit during the 2:35 pm candle. Definitely more profitable than the previously mentioned 7 EMA Cross signal. Although profitable, the High-Volume signal seems premature. I just don't know yet. Eventually, I hope to be able to read momentum and base decisions on it primarily, discarding pre-determined entry/exit points. I really am impatient with myself and need to allot the time to learn this.
This is still really new but has been a necessity for a long time. I never have had a plan, a framework, for trading and certainly never had any semblance of an exit strategy. Mostly, I have operated based on one primary signal; the high-volume reversal of direction.
All of this is a work in progress but I am excited by the possibilities. I just wish I had more time for the research...
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
August 26th
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." - Stephen Hawking
-
Got to the markets very late today... caught only the last 15 minutes. So, I took a paper-trade on SKF just for fun. Picked up some (fake)gas money.
I included the ARO chart as a continuation of yeterday's "What's Familiar" theme. At 12:45-12:50pm, two dojis in a row on low volume coupled with a cross of the 17 EMA by the 7 EMA. A short trade at this point would never have reached above the entry price of $41.02. Trend continued into EOD and would have yielded up to 84 cents of gain. Price never closed above the 17 EMA throughout the downtrend. And the low point of the trend? A doji at 3:45pm. After the doji... reversal of the trend.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
August 25th
It's tough to think "trend" when getting to the markets with only a couple hours left in the day. When I only have a little time to spend, I am mostly studying what's familiar and not necessarily looking for trades. What I see in COCO that is familiar to many stocks: the high volume at 10:15 coupled with a decent price range but the open and close prices are relatively tight together ( a sign of potential reversal, the low of this candle is 7 cents off the reversal at 11:10), same thing repeated near the top of the reversal trend at the 12:10pm candle (this one actually was the reversal top), the ultra-low volume signals at 11:45 and 11:55 prior to the stock beginning a 38 cent leap upward in 15 minutes. How about the doji at 1:05pm coupled with very low volume and a cross of the 7 over the 17 EMA ( a short here with those signals would have yielded up to a 93 cent gain by about 3:30pm, with price never reaching up to touch the entry spot). At 3:20pm: a high volume spike after a long drop- coupled with the candle's wide price range but tight open and close price within 1 cent of the LOD (where I took my paper-trade off these signals of reversal). The next candle was the true reversal candle... the low volume on this turn looks very familiar.
Mostly, I just watch and study. And I like the repetition of signals... day after day. I look forward to the time when I can anticipate them and play many profitably.
Monday, August 24, 2009
August 24th
I had expected to be here from about noon until the close but an emergency project for the day-job took precedent. I found PBR as a big mover and started to watch it just as it was pulling back around noon. After returning from my project, I saw it consolidating after the big drop of the day. I looked for the price to reach for the 7 EMA after it had stopped at a higher low at 2:30 (up from the LOD back at 2:00pm). Long at 43.65, price poked up over the 7 EMA then withdrew, continuing to consolidate but also compressing. It made a doji at 2:40 (with a higher low) then another doji with a an even higher low; all the while compressing up against resistance at 43.66. I felt this was a positive development and looked toward a break out soon. Indeed, price went through resistance, through the 17 EMA, and gapped up into the next candle. Another reistence point was at 43.78 at which point the stock hesitated and I dumped it. The smart play would have been to short here but I decided to watch volume on the Raw Data feed to see how it behaved as it dropped to each successive support area. After the drop stalled at the 2:55pm- 3:05pm support area (basically LOD established back at 2:00-2:05), I started to track any upward momentum. I went long at 43.64, a bit late in retrospect because I caught the higher side (near the 7 EMA) of what could have been an extended consolidation channel. Price sunk some over the next two candles (the lower low on the 3:20pm candle had me nervous and my trigger finger was ready for stop loss at 43.54. However, price rebounded, cleared both 7 & 17 EMA and I rode the momentum up but exited at the resistence level of 43.73. I felt pretty good about it because price then dropped into the next candle. Good thing I didn't go short though, because price rebounded and rallied to 43.84. At the same time PBR was hitting that 43.84 level during the 3:30 -3:35 candles, the QQQQ and SPX were topping out and more importantly, the SPX topped out at the high of the 5-minute candle after a strong price climb. That right there is a great signal for reversal. See this link for details:
Friday, August 21, 2009
August 21st
I'm excited about my "bad trade." I don't remember being so thrilled at a mistake since the early days of my practice trading in January... and I'm not being sarcastic. Explanation to follow at a later time.
We're taking the bike out for a ride and to grab some dinner.
For the first time in many weeks I am encouraged and re-energized.
-
I didn't get a chance to update this post last night... the ride was great and the dinner was casual. A little rain fell but only while we were in the restaurant so we managed to not get wet... A good evening to that point. Unfortunately, later my beloved Red Sox fell to the Evil Empire. I shut it off before the end and just moments ago learned the final score... wow, that was ugly.
-
Anyone who has read this blog knows that I am a big fan of Scott Farnham's trading skills and a student of the trading style to which he adheres. With that in mind, I have read and am now re-reading the highlighted passages of "The Strategic Day Trader" by Robert Deel; a book which he mentioned last year in his blog. In it, Deel outlines the use of the 7 & 17 EMA to evaluate trend, among other relevant concepts. At FNG Day Trader, Farnham mentions that he doesn't pay much attention to the 7 & 17 but still uses it to remind him of trend.
Moving Averages are based on old information, of course. As such, decisions derived from them will tend to be late. However, Deel's approach focuses strictly on capturing as much as possible of primary trends of stocks and is very critical of scalping. He recommends the 7 & 17 EMA as a way of taking the meatiest parts of long trends. I decided to give it some attention and see if it was a tool I could use. On the first trade yesterday, I shorted ARO when the 7 crossed down over the 17 EMA. I exited at $39.04 where I thought the price would find support (see: low of 12:05pm candle) and netted a gain of $97. The stock did stop there but descended to a stronger support area about 6 cents below (see: 11:25 and 11:30am candles, and 12:00 candle).
Moving Averages are based on old information, of course. As such, decisions derived from them will tend to be late. However, Deel's approach focuses strictly on capturing as much as possible of primary trends of stocks and is very critical of scalping. He recommends the 7 & 17 EMA as a way of taking the meatiest parts of long trends. I decided to give it some attention and see if it was a tool I could use. On the first trade yesterday, I shorted ARO when the 7 crossed down over the 17 EMA. I exited at $39.04 where I thought the price would find support (see: low of 12:05pm candle) and netted a gain of $97. The stock did stop there but descended to a stronger support area about 6 cents below (see: 11:25 and 11:30am candles, and 12:00 candle).
As mentioned earlier, this trade had a late entry on the full trend move but that is the nature of trading moving average crosses. This represents something different for me because I am ususally very early on entries and far too early on exits, playing the first parts of a move. This one was playing the back end of the move, a good lesson, I believe.
The second and final trade was one where I was trying to play the next move after the success on the prior one. I looked for price to stabilize (consolidate) or reverse to the upside right away after the pullback of the huge, all-day runup. The large spike in volume during the 1:15 time period was my clue to the probablility of it happening. I watched to see which would take place; reversal or consolidation... Consolidation was the result and continued for 25 minutes. I started to feel something was going to happen during the 5th candle; volume ramping up after dojis on the three minute chart. Then came a quick drop near the end of the 5-minute candle. I shorted, the price stopped on a dime, and started up. I was suckered by the head fake, something all my basketball coaches had told me never to do when I was younger. (Farnham also warns of this fake-out in the comment section of his 10/31/08 essay entitled "My Set Up," where he states, "I do pay close attention to the clock. Many times when the clock is about to change to a new 5 minute period, moves happen that are not real, as in a nice down trend and then the candle shoots up 10 seconds before the change over, only to drop back down afterwards.")
The second and final trade was one where I was trying to play the next move after the success on the prior one. I looked for price to stabilize (consolidate) or reverse to the upside right away after the pullback of the huge, all-day runup. The large spike in volume during the 1:15 time period was my clue to the probablility of it happening. I watched to see which would take place; reversal or consolidation... Consolidation was the result and continued for 25 minutes. I started to feel something was going to happen during the 5th candle; volume ramping up after dojis on the three minute chart. Then came a quick drop near the end of the 5-minute candle. I shorted, the price stopped on a dime, and started up. I was suckered by the head fake, something all my basketball coaches had told me never to do when I was younger. (Farnham also warns of this fake-out in the comment section of his 10/31/08 essay entitled "My Set Up," where he states, "I do pay close attention to the clock. Many times when the clock is about to change to a new 5 minute period, moves happen that are not real, as in a nice down trend and then the candle shoots up 10 seconds before the change over, only to drop back down afterwards.")
I nailed the last lowest price of the primary pullback/consolidation of the stock all day! It was perfectly, beautifully wrong! The next candle was a doji, and then an eight cent pop, 15 minutes of conslidation, price crossing the 7 & 17 EMA during the 2:10pm candle, then trend. The 7 never really got close to a cross of the 17 from that point on. I stayed with this trade and played it as if it were a long, exiting during the 3:50pm price spike, only 15 cents from the eventual top and 5 cents above the end of day consolidation area. A big losing trade? Yes, the biggest I could make it. What I take from this, and what I find encouraging is that I am getting a feel for motion, trend, and the interplay of price with S & R. I'm attempting to play each trend in succession instead of waiting for the perfect, favored set-up, trying to identify patterns of movement and the influence of volume on that movement. I am NOT about gains and losses; I've descended the ladder well below that level. I'm tearing down in hopes of rebuilding. The last time I started fresh, I went about 7-8 months without trading my real account. I am now back there... in the practice account where wins and losses are irrelevant. It may take 6 months, a year, maybe more. But I believe I am learning every day and I know I won't just wake up and be suddenly able to do this well, like a flick of a switch. The learning curve is a gradual trend and not a price spike. I am in consolidation. And those are all the trading metaphors I can stomach right now...
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
August 19th
I had a chance to get into the markets for the last hour and decided to focus my attention on FAS, the high-powered 3x mover. I waited for a while and found a high-probability entry as the stock dropped deeply accompanied by a spike in volume. I got a reasonably good entry when I thought it was started back up (at one point early on, it was up about 15 cents) but it turns out, I was just a bit early and it then dropped a bit more. I stuck with it while it based for two candles then made a higher low and started to climb. As it hit the 3:29 candle on its way on trend, I sold it for a small gain and I still can't figure out why... This move went on to top out at $68.37, giving me a chance at 93 cents of gain. I took only 6 cents; a measly 6.5 % available. Had I stuck with this move, I wouldn't have been taking the short against this trend later on... a trade which lost $170. This has been an ongoing problem with my good entries over the many months I've been in training. I continue to search for a reliable exit signal. I just don't have any idea what my trigger to exit is...
-
The second trade, a loss, was one which I shouldn't have entered to begin with, as mentioned above. However, I took this short entry after seeing that my regular signals of reversal had presented themselves: big price move and a spike in volume on the 3-minute chart. This was premature as I discovered... the original move was a strong one and continued up. I didn't worry too much about it and immediately went to the charts to figure out what was going on with this entry. I didn't stop out the position, instead I was focused on what I had missed. I closed it out just before 4:00pm. I am really not concerned about my gains and losses in the papertrade account anymore. I'll post them but I really am not going to paper-trade anymore as if it is with real money. As of late July, I know that I am not ready for live trading and am not going to approach my practice time as if it is an impending ramp-up to working in my real account. It is going to be more like last Feb, March, and April when I first started the blog; posting results but not worrying about the wins and losses and no thoughts of going live anytime soon.
-
I finally received my new book from Amazon yesterday. "The Strategic Day Trader," by Robert Deel. A lot of info is not relevant to what I am doing so I am cruising through it. I think so far it is worth the $6 plus shipping that I paid. There is some relevant material that I am highlighting now regarding the use of 15 minute charts to stay in trend. Actually quite relevant, considering my first trade today that I bailed out of way too early.
-
1 for 2, a 50% win rate. Loss of $110 in 1 hour of paper-trading.
-
The second trade, a loss, was one which I shouldn't have entered to begin with, as mentioned above. However, I took this short entry after seeing that my regular signals of reversal had presented themselves: big price move and a spike in volume on the 3-minute chart. This was premature as I discovered... the original move was a strong one and continued up. I didn't worry too much about it and immediately went to the charts to figure out what was going on with this entry. I didn't stop out the position, instead I was focused on what I had missed. I closed it out just before 4:00pm. I am really not concerned about my gains and losses in the papertrade account anymore. I'll post them but I really am not going to paper-trade anymore as if it is with real money. As of late July, I know that I am not ready for live trading and am not going to approach my practice time as if it is an impending ramp-up to working in my real account. It is going to be more like last Feb, March, and April when I first started the blog; posting results but not worrying about the wins and losses and no thoughts of going live anytime soon.
-
I finally received my new book from Amazon yesterday. "The Strategic Day Trader," by Robert Deel. A lot of info is not relevant to what I am doing so I am cruising through it. I think so far it is worth the $6 plus shipping that I paid. There is some relevant material that I am highlighting now regarding the use of 15 minute charts to stay in trend. Actually quite relevant, considering my first trade today that I bailed out of way too early.
-
1 for 2, a 50% win rate. Loss of $110 in 1 hour of paper-trading.
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
August 18th
It's been a nice break and I had a chance to get back to the blog today. I paper-traded last Thursday, August 13th and did 13 for 13 for a $295 gain, although it was mostly a scalp-fest and not really trading in trend. I didn't trade on Friday the 14th. Yesterday, I was 2 for 4 in the live account and was down, -$27. I've been less concerned about the blog of late. Just trying to prioritize...
-
I let two stops go too long today; one for $150 and one for $100. I also had one trading error , clicking sell instead of buy to cover... leading to a $50 loss. It wasn't bad other than that. I have been starting over in a sense. I must learn entry signals other than the one I had been using, so I have been back to the basics of chart set-ups, etc. Trying to study and understand them in association with volume and momentum. I'm less concerned now with the overall chart or on what the current price per share may be. I am paying close attention to the "pulsation" of price levels, especially on movement as the price approaches critical areas; S & R, moving average lines, trend lines. At the same time, I have taken to watching the time & sales window as well as level II which is very new to me and doesn't quite make sense after only a few days. I am seeing patterns of movement so that is encouraging. If anyone knows of a detailed primer on reading and interpreting level II and/or Time & Sales, as they affect price movement, please leave me a comment. I am especially looking for free web-based material but am interested to hear of other sources as well.
-
9 for 15, a 60% win rate. Loss of $17 in 5 hours of paper-trading primarily because of two excessive stop-losses and one trading error.
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Barriers to Entry
I have often thought about how few credible trader education sources there are. Yes, a few good books and some very good blogs but very few hands-on sources.
This "art" reminds me of how knowledge used to be passed on... monks diligently spending their lives copying text by hand, in monasteries far away from the masses. It's no surprise that I am not the only one who has thought about it. I found this August 9th post by Dr Brett Steenbarger on his blog, www.traderfeed.blogspot.com.
The Dynamics of Trading Success
It is unusual for elite levels of performance in any field to develop in isolation. Most often, success develops in what I call "performance incubators": structured situations that build skills over time through frequent practice and performance. For example, college basketball serves as an incubator for professional talent; the academies run by tennis pros serve as incubators for the pro tennis circuit; amateur and regional theaters incubate talent for Hollywood and Broadway; chess clubs incubate talent for national and international tournaments; minor leagues and college teams in baseball incubate major league talent; etc.
This post on "What Makes an Expert?"( http://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2008/01/what-makes-expert-three-surprising.html ) helps to explain why so many traders do not reach their full potential. Without structured incubation, it is difficult for skills to develop over time. Three years of experience become one year repeated three times over, not a cumulative learning experience.
Perhaps this is why research finds that so few active traders achieve consist success. ( http://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-common-is-elite-talent-among-day.html ) How many surgeons would be successful structuring their own training? How many pianists? Gymnasts?
Many "trader education" offerings are not efforts at incubation. How do we know this? They lack developed curricula. Successful incubators start with basic skills and develop more refined ones. Most educational efforts in trading are not training efforts in this sense. (See this post ( http://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2008/02/from-trader-education-to-trader.html ) for what a trading curriculum might look like). Indeed, it is difficult to think of successful incubation efforts in various performance fields that do not last for years of regular training before formal, professional performance commences.
How many traders have undergone such rigorous training? Might that help to explain why so few successful traders remain successful over time? Without developed skills across a range of market conditions, it would be difficult to adjust to shifting markets.
The sad truth is that few traders could afford to devote years to perfecting their craft; few educators have undergone development themselves to know how to structure a proper program of training. It's a shame; any trading firm that mastered incubation would ensure its successful future. Which is one reason why certain investment banks, which do structure their training and mentorship processes, remain at the top of their profession.
This "art" reminds me of how knowledge used to be passed on... monks diligently spending their lives copying text by hand, in monasteries far away from the masses. It's no surprise that I am not the only one who has thought about it. I found this August 9th post by Dr Brett Steenbarger on his blog, www.traderfeed.blogspot.com.
The Dynamics of Trading Success
It is unusual for elite levels of performance in any field to develop in isolation. Most often, success develops in what I call "performance incubators": structured situations that build skills over time through frequent practice and performance. For example, college basketball serves as an incubator for professional talent; the academies run by tennis pros serve as incubators for the pro tennis circuit; amateur and regional theaters incubate talent for Hollywood and Broadway; chess clubs incubate talent for national and international tournaments; minor leagues and college teams in baseball incubate major league talent; etc.
This post on "What Makes an Expert?"( http://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2008/01/what-makes-expert-three-surprising.html ) helps to explain why so many traders do not reach their full potential. Without structured incubation, it is difficult for skills to develop over time. Three years of experience become one year repeated three times over, not a cumulative learning experience.
Perhaps this is why research finds that so few active traders achieve consist success. ( http://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-common-is-elite-talent-among-day.html ) How many surgeons would be successful structuring their own training? How many pianists? Gymnasts?
Many "trader education" offerings are not efforts at incubation. How do we know this? They lack developed curricula. Successful incubators start with basic skills and develop more refined ones. Most educational efforts in trading are not training efforts in this sense. (See this post ( http://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2008/02/from-trader-education-to-trader.html ) for what a trading curriculum might look like). Indeed, it is difficult to think of successful incubation efforts in various performance fields that do not last for years of regular training before formal, professional performance commences.
How many traders have undergone such rigorous training? Might that help to explain why so few successful traders remain successful over time? Without developed skills across a range of market conditions, it would be difficult to adjust to shifting markets.
The sad truth is that few traders could afford to devote years to perfecting their craft; few educators have undergone development themselves to know how to structure a proper program of training. It's a shame; any trading firm that mastered incubation would ensure its successful future. Which is one reason why certain investment banks, which do structure their training and mentorship processes, remain at the top of their profession.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
August 12th - No trades
No Trades today or yesterday the 11th. Day job has been very active and I'm thankful. The work I do is negatively affected by bad weather conditions and June and July were two of the wettest months on record. Needless to say, trading will not be paying the bills anytime soon and as much as I dislike my current work situation, it has for nearly 19 years provided a solid middle class lifestyle. I really have been thinking lately of how good my life is and how grateful I am for what I have.
Getting ahead means constantly looking ahead, pressing harder for that next goal. However, it is important to look back and recognize where I am in relation to where I've been and where others who are less fortunate may be. Life can't always be about getting to the next rung on the ladder. Sometimes it is simply enough to stay still for a while and look around.
-
I have for nearly 8 months been focused on, and at times obsessed with trading for a living. For some of that period, I have treated trading like it WAS my job, even though it paid me nothing. I had goals, you see. I was on a mission: a change of careers, relieving my wife of the doldrums of her job, saving a family member who is near retirement and could use a bit of help with retirement funds. Lots of good intentions. And, because I had these purely good intentions, I was going to be successful on my own terms; on my own timeline. Never mind the markets! Never mind my inexperience! I was skipper of this ship and I was charting my own course. Well, the market had other ideas. I took a large loss last month and it was a wake-up call. It wasn't really the money... it was within the boundaries and wouldn't crush me financially. What was so difficult about it was the realization that what I had been working on for most of the year, my method, was flawed and inherently destined for failure. I was making plans... plans that had gone to hell with one bad day. The plans, as well as the method of trading, were scrapped and while I am not back at square one, I have descended the ladder many rungs. So, that is where I am now. Many rungs lower and in many ways, starting over.
The last two days have been a great break. No trading, no time in front of the markets. Just the blue-collar work that I know all too well. When I first started in business, it was nerve-wracking with so much uncertainty, so much stress. Now, it is a respite from the stress. It is familiar and requires no thought. I really could do all facets of it in my sleep. And while I have been away from trading for three of the past four sessions, it has not been out of my thoughts. I have been evaluating my trading skills, such as they are. For some time, I have been aware of a number of weaknesses and have noticed others in the past few days. I have thought of my strengths and how to use them differently. In all ways, this break has been good. Since July 23rd and my large loss, I have had 9 winning days out of 10. Small gains... cautious while I try to acclimate to trading without adding to losers to compensate for bad entries. I guess 9 of 10 is a good place to stop for a little while.
-
I have ordered a new trading book from Amazon and am searching the web for details about entry signals. I have printed a couple articles from tradingmarkets.com and have been reading them over and over. I go through the chart formations in my head as I work my day-job. I think about FNG charts and the ideals put forth there.
One of the two primary weaknesses I have noticed lately is that I do not look for/recognize good entry set-ups. I have been a one-trick pony these past months. Always looking for the high-volume reversal as an entry. So much have I relied on it that I will often watch a nice trend pass me by in anticipation of seeing that move I know best. Well, I'm tired of that. I want to start using that high-probablility sign of reversal as an exit spot instead.
My second weakness actually came to me as Mrs Bluecollar and I discussed trading. She has asked me more than once why I don't just click buy when the markets are going up and click sell when the markets are dropping? I tried to explain to her that it isn't that easy. But, then I thought about the fact that I do often watch good trends pass me by, as I mentioned above. She is very much a "see-do" person. (insert your own personal watercraft joke here). I am mostly a "see-, think, evaluate, consider the many possibilities, measure the risk, -do " person. It's time to break out of the mold and trade what is in front of me now, not what might happen some time later. It's time to stop thinking my way out of good trades. To trade the tape in the momentum style, I will eventually have to act more on instinct than reason.
She and I are going to collaborate for a day of sim-trading during her upcoming vacation. I am confident it will be great for my training.
-
Day-job is busy through this week and much of next week is also booked. And it couldn't have come at a better time, for so many reasons. I am grateful for what I have, no matter how badly I want change...
-
I wish you all profitable trading: for gains and for knowledge.
Getting ahead means constantly looking ahead, pressing harder for that next goal. However, it is important to look back and recognize where I am in relation to where I've been and where others who are less fortunate may be. Life can't always be about getting to the next rung on the ladder. Sometimes it is simply enough to stay still for a while and look around.
-
I have for nearly 8 months been focused on, and at times obsessed with trading for a living. For some of that period, I have treated trading like it WAS my job, even though it paid me nothing. I had goals, you see. I was on a mission: a change of careers, relieving my wife of the doldrums of her job, saving a family member who is near retirement and could use a bit of help with retirement funds. Lots of good intentions. And, because I had these purely good intentions, I was going to be successful on my own terms; on my own timeline. Never mind the markets! Never mind my inexperience! I was skipper of this ship and I was charting my own course. Well, the market had other ideas. I took a large loss last month and it was a wake-up call. It wasn't really the money... it was within the boundaries and wouldn't crush me financially. What was so difficult about it was the realization that what I had been working on for most of the year, my method, was flawed and inherently destined for failure. I was making plans... plans that had gone to hell with one bad day. The plans, as well as the method of trading, were scrapped and while I am not back at square one, I have descended the ladder many rungs. So, that is where I am now. Many rungs lower and in many ways, starting over.
The last two days have been a great break. No trading, no time in front of the markets. Just the blue-collar work that I know all too well. When I first started in business, it was nerve-wracking with so much uncertainty, so much stress. Now, it is a respite from the stress. It is familiar and requires no thought. I really could do all facets of it in my sleep. And while I have been away from trading for three of the past four sessions, it has not been out of my thoughts. I have been evaluating my trading skills, such as they are. For some time, I have been aware of a number of weaknesses and have noticed others in the past few days. I have thought of my strengths and how to use them differently. In all ways, this break has been good. Since July 23rd and my large loss, I have had 9 winning days out of 10. Small gains... cautious while I try to acclimate to trading without adding to losers to compensate for bad entries. I guess 9 of 10 is a good place to stop for a little while.
-
I have ordered a new trading book from Amazon and am searching the web for details about entry signals. I have printed a couple articles from tradingmarkets.com and have been reading them over and over. I go through the chart formations in my head as I work my day-job. I think about FNG charts and the ideals put forth there.
One of the two primary weaknesses I have noticed lately is that I do not look for/recognize good entry set-ups. I have been a one-trick pony these past months. Always looking for the high-volume reversal as an entry. So much have I relied on it that I will often watch a nice trend pass me by in anticipation of seeing that move I know best. Well, I'm tired of that. I want to start using that high-probablility sign of reversal as an exit spot instead.
My second weakness actually came to me as Mrs Bluecollar and I discussed trading. She has asked me more than once why I don't just click buy when the markets are going up and click sell when the markets are dropping? I tried to explain to her that it isn't that easy. But, then I thought about the fact that I do often watch good trends pass me by, as I mentioned above. She is very much a "see-do" person. (insert your own personal watercraft joke here). I am mostly a "see-, think, evaluate, consider the many possibilities, measure the risk, -do " person. It's time to break out of the mold and trade what is in front of me now, not what might happen some time later. It's time to stop thinking my way out of good trades. To trade the tape in the momentum style, I will eventually have to act more on instinct than reason.
She and I are going to collaborate for a day of sim-trading during her upcoming vacation. I am confident it will be great for my training.
-
Day-job is busy through this week and much of next week is also booked. And it couldn't have come at a better time, for so many reasons. I am grateful for what I have, no matter how badly I want change...
-
I wish you all profitable trading: for gains and for knowledge.
Monday, August 10, 2009
August 10th
It didn't go too badly today but the gains were small. I still find that I am not buying the breakouts and breakdowns but rather, am buying reversals and trying to hold them as long as I feel is right. This is a mode of thinking that often excludes me from the biggest moves. I have to learn to identify more entry opportunites and not wait for the one or two familiar entries I have. Also some patience wouldn't hurt. I missed the breakout in GENZ late in the day because it was just trading in a small channel causing me to abandon it. I felt it was going to do something but I was looking for greener pastures... Speaking of patience, I am still in scalper mode. this is really not the type of trading I am trying to achieve. My largest gain today was only 9 cents (on a full 1000 share position). The next best was also 9 cents but with a half-position of 500 shares. I will study my entries and exits later and see if more was available. As mentioned earlier, my preference for playing reversals of direction may be a limiting factor in this.
Had one scratch trade and three others that were essentially scratches. I wanted to play conservatively and not take losses on stops when I recognized that I was in questionable trades. ONe trade did go to stop-loss and I exited minus $35. A bad decision at end of day on GENZ... I let it run past my stop while talking with my wife who had just come in from work. It moved pretty quickly... the stop loss was about 50% larger than I had planned.
The next two days are busy with Day-Job so likely no trading until later in the week.
-
7 for 9 winners, a 78% success rate. Gain of $82 in 6.5 hrs of paper-trading. One scratch trade not counted.
Tape Reading - Another description
I found this about Tape Reading and thought I'd reprint it here.
It comes from Vad Graifer of Reality Trader dot com.
Please beware that the original is a Sales Pitch designed to sell a book in addition to providing education. I am NOT recommending the book and have no intention of buying it at this time. I am offering author and source so no legal problems will arise from my partial reprint of it here; parts of the original have been removed by me. If you are interested in the sales pitch (the completetext), you can find it at the above-noted source by the above-noted author. In no way am I attempting to make this my own. I have inserted an editorial below and it is highlighted.
The Dual Reality
Traders come to the marketplace with pre-conceived ideas about how and why the markets move. While some of these ideas are valid, most are based on untrue assumptions . Many of these assumptions are found within the un-moderated areas of bulletin boards and trading threads. Most of these assumptions, while seem logical and true, are simply dead wrong. This leads traders down a road of failure without offering a trader an explanation to why he was unable to make the trading plan work effectively. This early failure leads to disgust and negativity towards trading for living. Many turn this emotional state to blame of the market and its participants in a manner that the trader is not able to apply what happened in their trading plan to lead to a positive result. This lack of accountability moves traders away from profitability over the long term and does not give the trader a solid foundation to build his or her portfolio. All this stems from initial misinformation that was presented to a trader and accepted blindly.
There is a true reality and a reality that traders create for themselves from such misinformation that is accepted blindly. Unfortunately, these two realities are never the same. However, the more a trader is a detached and objective observer rather than an opinionated and emotional follower, the closer his reality to real market reality becomes.
The RealityTrader Tape Reading Philosophy
This provides a solid foundation for a better possible outcome in his trading plan. Our philosophy is that the only reality of the market has to do with the price/volume action of a specific stock. All other factors are either hints or distortions. A seasoned trader distinguishes himself from a naive follower by his ability to see the true reality through all the curtains provided by those with less than adequate knowledge or misguided intentions. The stock market moves in its own manner. Stocks themselves move not because financial circumstances of the company dictate its direction. Otherwise, it would be too easy. Traders would simply buy what has strong fundamentals and sell what has weak fundamentals. Obviously this is not the case. Instead, interests of players in the stock and their emotions move the price. This philosophy can be confirmed by strong moves in stocks with questionable fundamentals. It can also be confirmed by a stock with great news that declines in price following the release.
RT stands for Read and Trade.
READ means two things:
1. Forget the Aristotle logic, which in essence is trying to establish a firm link between a reason and an outcome. Obviously this does not work in the market. Learn to see what is hidden under the surface. Ignore what is being offered to you by those that want you to see things at face value. Look at what is shown to you as bait for you to go in a certain direction. Then ask who wants you there and for what reason.
Furthermore, we can not possibly know all the circumstances surrounding stock movements, all the shares accumulated or distributed, and what owners plan to do with them. They might want to sell for reasons that have nothing to do with current company situation. For instance, a fund needs free money for another operation and we see selling when nobody expected it by trading from straight fundamentals. That's why a seasoned trader will only look at what is going on in a stock, from a price/volume action view, in a form he chooses, that lets him be closer to reality. Our preferred way to read stock market is tape reading. This is also why only a detached and unemotional state of mind allows us to make our decisions objectively, with no emotions distorting the picture. The link from your mechanical approach to the enhancement of your mental approach will develop your winning and confident attitude each trading day. Reality defines what is happening before you as you read it. There are no predictions or false expectations for what a market or stock will do. There is just what you see that demands the response to enter and exit a trade with as much profit or as little loss as the trade allows. There is no ego to block that response nor is there a lack of accountability when the trade moves against you. Trading resides within you and develops from a reality learned.
Tape Reading 101
Tape Reading is one of the oldest methods of market movement interpretation. Like any other methods applied by market players, it's intended to show "what's behind the ticker". There is no tape itself anymore. It has been replaced by a scrolling Times Of Sales Window and Electronic Tickers. But the term, and more importantly, the principles are alive and are as useful as ever. They are based on aspects that never change. These are human psychology and major accumulation/distribution rules.
We prefer Tape Reading as our major method. There are plenty of technical indicators used by traders in different combinations. Many of them are very sophisticated and computers make it easy to watch them in real time. However, Tape Reading is a truly universal method that can be combined with any technical study, and we suggest it as a base for any other method traders like. Sophisticated indicators based on complicated calculations tend to somewhat mask the reality of a scenario happening. Tape Reading goes right to the roots of the stock’s action. This is necessary for newer traders.
Like no other method, Tape Reading deals with reality itself allowing traders to see market moving forces in action and to judge which one prevails at that moment. It provides us with a look into what other players try to hide and then allows us to separate reality from our perception.
{editorial: I would insert here as an excellent real-life example, last week's AIG trading discussion between Scott Farnham and commenter CN on Scott's FNG blog, which I posted here on August 7th. It covers how Scott felt the "big boys" were acquiring shares of AIG and his method of reading it as a sign of a bullish move.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29610017&postID=1744627143642038504 }
The best example of this is as old as the Wall Street situation of “selling on news”. There are numerous examples of “XYZ is selling on such a great news.” Tape Reading shows why and how it happens. This tells you when you should expect non-conventional action on the stock and how to exploit it.
Tape Reading deals with two major categories of market players. They are the Smart Money and the Public. You can replace these old terms with any pair you like (big guys and small time traders, insiders and online traders, institutions and retail traders, etc). However, the core of market events is the same. Tape Reading is a method of analyzing which side is doing what at that moment. Analysis is done by observing the only, and ultimately, truthful indicators of Price and Volume Action.
Tape Reading does not always answer all our questions. In the stock market, nothing does. The stock market has no single ultimate answer. Otherwise this answer would already have been discovered and the market would have ceased to exist. There is no way price would ever change if traders knew the exact situation. Furthermore, any absolute method, once discovered by someone, could not be kept a secret for others. What Tape Reading does is:
1. It puts probability on your side as it allows you to read the truth to the extent it can be read, putting as few "interpreters" between you and reality as possible.
2. It allows you to develop a detached state of mind that a side observer possesses. The state of mind that traders want to experience is when they look at market action with no emotions, seeing clearly what happens. This is in direct conflict with cloudy judgement of emotionally involved traders with formed opinions that could be right or wrong, but in any case has nothing to do with reality.
Mental State
A positive mental state is an extremely important factor for successful trading. A trader's inner state of mind directly impacts his performance. In short-term trading, the right mindset plays an even bigger role. It ultimately defines whether a trader's technical knowledge and mechanical skills will lead to success. Almost all the top traders in this industry acknowledge the fact that the understanding of how the market functions is just a foundation for success. Self-control is what eventually makes a winner out of a trader.
One of the most difficult shifts in thinking that a trader has to develop is the switch from “Prediction" to “Response". Instead of a trader always trying to predict or expect an event to happen, they simply respond to the event that is before them. The wrong assumption that is made by a trader is that he knows what the market will do at a certain moment. No one ever knows with 100% accuracy what will happen. The trader needs to shift his thinking in a manner that he will not try to predict, but rather respond, to whatever the market decides to do. This type of thinking requires that a trader develop a sense of absolute self-reliance. To achieve this state, a trader must take full responsibility for any outcome of his actions (or lack of actions). Any loss has to become a learning point. This is only possible if the trader is willing to take undivided responsibility.
In order to read undistorted reality, the trader needs to read the market with no emotions, as a detached observer. It's not easy to get rid of emotions but it's doable. Accepting the fact that nobody can be always right, willingness to admit mistake fast and thinking of trading capital as of tool rather than money are some of steps in right direction. The trader can't progress unemotionally if every uptick puts him in a euphoric state and every downtick scares him. A trader that experiences strong emotions loses the ability to see the reality of the trade. From this, the trader goes from hope to fear. These emotions dictate his actions and leads to almost certain failure over time. A seasoned trader lets only one entity dictate his actions, the market. Self-confidence, self-reliance, cold blooded reading of reality and keeping emotions in check are the traits of successful trader. Our room provides a powerful educational program devoted to development of a correct state of mind that members can build their confidence upon everyday.
It comes from Vad Graifer of Reality Trader dot com.
Please beware that the original is a Sales Pitch designed to sell a book in addition to providing education. I am NOT recommending the book and have no intention of buying it at this time. I am offering author and source so no legal problems will arise from my partial reprint of it here; parts of the original have been removed by me. If you are interested in the sales pitch (the completetext), you can find it at the above-noted source by the above-noted author. In no way am I attempting to make this my own. I have inserted an editorial below and it is highlighted.
The Dual Reality
Traders come to the marketplace with pre-conceived ideas about how and why the markets move. While some of these ideas are valid, most are based on untrue assumptions . Many of these assumptions are found within the un-moderated areas of bulletin boards and trading threads. Most of these assumptions, while seem logical and true, are simply dead wrong. This leads traders down a road of failure without offering a trader an explanation to why he was unable to make the trading plan work effectively. This early failure leads to disgust and negativity towards trading for living. Many turn this emotional state to blame of the market and its participants in a manner that the trader is not able to apply what happened in their trading plan to lead to a positive result. This lack of accountability moves traders away from profitability over the long term and does not give the trader a solid foundation to build his or her portfolio. All this stems from initial misinformation that was presented to a trader and accepted blindly.
There is a true reality and a reality that traders create for themselves from such misinformation that is accepted blindly. Unfortunately, these two realities are never the same. However, the more a trader is a detached and objective observer rather than an opinionated and emotional follower, the closer his reality to real market reality becomes.
The RealityTrader Tape Reading Philosophy
This provides a solid foundation for a better possible outcome in his trading plan. Our philosophy is that the only reality of the market has to do with the price/volume action of a specific stock. All other factors are either hints or distortions. A seasoned trader distinguishes himself from a naive follower by his ability to see the true reality through all the curtains provided by those with less than adequate knowledge or misguided intentions. The stock market moves in its own manner. Stocks themselves move not because financial circumstances of the company dictate its direction. Otherwise, it would be too easy. Traders would simply buy what has strong fundamentals and sell what has weak fundamentals. Obviously this is not the case. Instead, interests of players in the stock and their emotions move the price. This philosophy can be confirmed by strong moves in stocks with questionable fundamentals. It can also be confirmed by a stock with great news that declines in price following the release.
RT stands for Read and Trade.
READ means two things:
1. Forget the Aristotle logic, which in essence is trying to establish a firm link between a reason and an outcome. Obviously this does not work in the market. Learn to see what is hidden under the surface. Ignore what is being offered to you by those that want you to see things at face value. Look at what is shown to you as bait for you to go in a certain direction. Then ask who wants you there and for what reason.
Furthermore, we can not possibly know all the circumstances surrounding stock movements, all the shares accumulated or distributed, and what owners plan to do with them. They might want to sell for reasons that have nothing to do with current company situation. For instance, a fund needs free money for another operation and we see selling when nobody expected it by trading from straight fundamentals. That's why a seasoned trader will only look at what is going on in a stock, from a price/volume action view, in a form he chooses, that lets him be closer to reality. Our preferred way to read stock market is tape reading. This is also why only a detached and unemotional state of mind allows us to make our decisions objectively, with no emotions distorting the picture. The link from your mechanical approach to the enhancement of your mental approach will develop your winning and confident attitude each trading day. Reality defines what is happening before you as you read it. There are no predictions or false expectations for what a market or stock will do. There is just what you see that demands the response to enter and exit a trade with as much profit or as little loss as the trade allows. There is no ego to block that response nor is there a lack of accountability when the trade moves against you. Trading resides within you and develops from a reality learned.
Tape Reading 101
Tape Reading is one of the oldest methods of market movement interpretation. Like any other methods applied by market players, it's intended to show "what's behind the ticker". There is no tape itself anymore. It has been replaced by a scrolling Times Of Sales Window and Electronic Tickers. But the term, and more importantly, the principles are alive and are as useful as ever. They are based on aspects that never change. These are human psychology and major accumulation/distribution rules.
We prefer Tape Reading as our major method. There are plenty of technical indicators used by traders in different combinations. Many of them are very sophisticated and computers make it easy to watch them in real time. However, Tape Reading is a truly universal method that can be combined with any technical study, and we suggest it as a base for any other method traders like. Sophisticated indicators based on complicated calculations tend to somewhat mask the reality of a scenario happening. Tape Reading goes right to the roots of the stock’s action. This is necessary for newer traders.
Like no other method, Tape Reading deals with reality itself allowing traders to see market moving forces in action and to judge which one prevails at that moment. It provides us with a look into what other players try to hide and then allows us to separate reality from our perception.
{editorial: I would insert here as an excellent real-life example, last week's AIG trading discussion between Scott Farnham and commenter CN on Scott's FNG blog, which I posted here on August 7th. It covers how Scott felt the "big boys" were acquiring shares of AIG and his method of reading it as a sign of a bullish move.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29610017&postID=1744627143642038504 }
The best example of this is as old as the Wall Street situation of “selling on news”. There are numerous examples of “XYZ is selling on such a great news.” Tape Reading shows why and how it happens. This tells you when you should expect non-conventional action on the stock and how to exploit it.
Tape Reading deals with two major categories of market players. They are the Smart Money and the Public. You can replace these old terms with any pair you like (big guys and small time traders, insiders and online traders, institutions and retail traders, etc). However, the core of market events is the same. Tape Reading is a method of analyzing which side is doing what at that moment. Analysis is done by observing the only, and ultimately, truthful indicators of Price and Volume Action.
Tape Reading does not always answer all our questions. In the stock market, nothing does. The stock market has no single ultimate answer. Otherwise this answer would already have been discovered and the market would have ceased to exist. There is no way price would ever change if traders knew the exact situation. Furthermore, any absolute method, once discovered by someone, could not be kept a secret for others. What Tape Reading does is:
1. It puts probability on your side as it allows you to read the truth to the extent it can be read, putting as few "interpreters" between you and reality as possible.
2. It allows you to develop a detached state of mind that a side observer possesses. The state of mind that traders want to experience is when they look at market action with no emotions, seeing clearly what happens. This is in direct conflict with cloudy judgement of emotionally involved traders with formed opinions that could be right or wrong, but in any case has nothing to do with reality.
Mental State
A positive mental state is an extremely important factor for successful trading. A trader's inner state of mind directly impacts his performance. In short-term trading, the right mindset plays an even bigger role. It ultimately defines whether a trader's technical knowledge and mechanical skills will lead to success. Almost all the top traders in this industry acknowledge the fact that the understanding of how the market functions is just a foundation for success. Self-control is what eventually makes a winner out of a trader.
One of the most difficult shifts in thinking that a trader has to develop is the switch from “Prediction" to “Response". Instead of a trader always trying to predict or expect an event to happen, they simply respond to the event that is before them. The wrong assumption that is made by a trader is that he knows what the market will do at a certain moment. No one ever knows with 100% accuracy what will happen. The trader needs to shift his thinking in a manner that he will not try to predict, but rather respond, to whatever the market decides to do. This type of thinking requires that a trader develop a sense of absolute self-reliance. To achieve this state, a trader must take full responsibility for any outcome of his actions (or lack of actions). Any loss has to become a learning point. This is only possible if the trader is willing to take undivided responsibility.
In order to read undistorted reality, the trader needs to read the market with no emotions, as a detached observer. It's not easy to get rid of emotions but it's doable. Accepting the fact that nobody can be always right, willingness to admit mistake fast and thinking of trading capital as of tool rather than money are some of steps in right direction. The trader can't progress unemotionally if every uptick puts him in a euphoric state and every downtick scares him. A trader that experiences strong emotions loses the ability to see the reality of the trade. From this, the trader goes from hope to fear. These emotions dictate his actions and leads to almost certain failure over time. A seasoned trader lets only one entity dictate his actions, the market. Self-confidence, self-reliance, cold blooded reading of reality and keeping emotions in check are the traits of successful trader. Our room provides a powerful educational program devoted to development of a correct state of mind that members can build their confidence upon everyday.
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Excellent Essay by Michael Goode
I occasionally reprint the essays and articles of others here; things that are important to me or catch my eye for a number of reasons. What follows is a teriffic article in both content and quality of writing by Michael Goode of reapertrades.com. I had read it before and saved it. On the week-ends, I take some time and re-read the essays that I have saved. I'm posting this one because yesterday, my wife and I received a notice from a private-equity Commercial REIT that we bought from a trusted friend/ investment advisor about 6 years ago. At that time, this was the up-and-coming hot sector and like any good salesman, he was taking it around to clients. The notice indicated that the REIT was cutting its monthly dividend in half and its continuation was in jeopardy. Even before this news, the projected return had been cut on the entire investment and now will be lower than that revised projection. Forget about a gain on this investment, the outlook is questionable for getting our principle back.
I have highlighted the part of the essay which really caught my eye. The lesson here is just as Michael suggests: buying the "hot" item is not necesarily a bad thing. What is detrimental is over-weighting the potential prospects of the investment based on current hype and recent short-term performance. With regard to our uncertain REIT investment, clearly it was a good performer for a short time but the mistake was buying it as a "partner" in the investment. Once we were in, we were in for the whole deal. No exit. And that is the first of the two most important lessons Mrs Bluecollar and I have learned from the big recession of the past 18 months. There is no substitute for liquidity of investment, which relies on an open and active market. Secondly, if it's hot now, probablility dictates a reversion to the mean and the smart money will be getting out soon; taking us back to Lesson One above.
-
Proper weighting of evidence in making investment decisions
Jul 27
Posted by Reaper in All Categories, Statistics, Very Important Posts No Comments
This is a classic trading post from my investment blog GoodeValue.com.
This article should not surprise you, but I think it important to emphasize points I have made earlier about the predictable irrationality of investors. I recently came across a paper written by Dale Griffin and Amos Tversky, entitled The Weighing Of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence (no full-text version available online). This article gives evidence as to why investors ignore regression to the mean and why they do not pay attention to the reliability of certain kinds of financial information.
The research behind the article is not brilliant nor even very interesting. What is exciting is the theory that Griffin and Tversky put forth. They also review relevant prior research. It is best to start with their theory.
Their theory is that people pay too much attention to the strength or extremity of evidence and not enough attention to its weight or reliability. They do not put forth a theory as to why people do this, but such a theory does not matter to us. What is important is what this theory predicts and how we can use it to predict how other investors will behave so that we may profit from it. One of the most important predictions of this theory is that people will be overconfident when information strength is high and information weight is low but they will be underconfident when weight is high and strength is low.
What do I mean by information weight and strength? The strength of information would be its extremity. For example, when hiring from among a pool of job applicants, a job interview that goes very poorly is strongly negative information. Information weight is the reliability of the information. A 20 minute job interview is not a reliable indicator of a potential employee’s demeanor and character and thus can be characterized as low-weight information.
The simplest test of this theory involves having people guess about a spinning coin. Unbeknownst to most, coins that are spun will tend to land on either one side or the other, due to imperfections in the manufacture of said coins. Griffin and Tversky told their subjects about a series of coins. They gave their subjects results of coin spinning experiments that varied in both the strength of evidence (the percentage of spins that landed on either side) and the weight of that evidence (the number of times the coin had been spun). Subjects had to guess whether the coin was weighted towards heads or tails. Subjects also had to give their confidence for each decision they made. Keep in mind that even if a coin lands on head 60% of the time, it would not be implausible for it to wind up on heads four out of 10 times or 10 out of 20 times, due to random error.
If people were perfectly logical, their confidence would increase as a function of both the strength of the evidence (the percentage of heads) and the weight of the evidence (the number of spins). There is a way to calculate the statistically correct inference and the confidence one can have in that inference given a certain weight and strength. This can be done by using Bayes’ theorem, which I will mercifully avoid describing here. While it would not be reasonable to expect people to always draw the statistically correct conclusion, it would be reasonable for them to be consistent. That was not the case.
In fact, the researchers’ theory was confirmed: given strong evidence with little weight (e.g., a coin that lands on heads 80% of the time, after five spins), people tend to be overconfident. Given weak evidence with a high weight (e.g., a coin that lands on heads 60% of the time, after 17 spins), people tend to be less confident than they should be. Overall, the researchers found that people relied over twice as much on the strength of the information as they did on its weight.
What does this mean for us as investors? First, if we pick our stocks using our intuitive judgment, we are at risk of becoming overconfident in our stock picking when our decision is heavily influenced by strong information of low weight (low reliability). A good example of this would be the novice investor’s choice to invest in a company primarily because he likes their product. Unless that investor is an expert in that type of product, such information is rarely useful. Conversely, we are at risk of being underconfident in our stock picking when the evidence is rather weak but highly reliable. I think Wal-Mart WMT is a great example of an investment with weak but reliable information in its favor: its PE ratio is average, its recent growth has been steady but unremarkable, and its brand name is well-known. These pieces of information are all highly reliable, but they indicate that Wal-Mart is a pretty good investment, not a great investment.
Oftentimes, conflicting information about a company will be of different strengths and weights. Whether by using a quantitative investment method or by just being aware of how much weight you should give to each piece of information, you must always consider the reliability or weight you should put on a piece of information when you are making investment decisions.
Besides the implications for costs and our personal investment decisions, this research has important implications for us because other investors will make these mistakes. They will not pay enough attention to the reliability of information (its weight). This will lead to consistent mispricing of stocks. This explains why value stocks outperform growth stocks: investors put too much weight in unreliable estimates of future growth, which leads them to bid up the price of growth stocks too high.
Other consistent inefficiencies in the market are also likely caused by investors not paying enough attention to the reliability of information. Companies in exciting sectors or industries are valued more highly (have higher PE ratios) than companies in less exciting industries, despite evidence that hot sectors do not outperform the market and may under-perform the market as a whole. While some might say that investors buying into the latest hot sector are just being stupid, I would argue that they are just over-weighting the importance of the industry’s future and under-weighting the importance of value (as measured by the PE ratio).
There are probably other stock market inefficiencies that this can explain. One anomaly that this explains is the success of stock promoters. The rubes who buy promoted stocks (Spongetech comes to mind) pay attention to the extreme positivity of press releases and newsletter while ignoring the low reliability of such sources.
Disclosure: I have no position in WMT. I have a disclosure policy. This article was originally written three years ago and published elsewhere. I have a disclosure policy.
I have highlighted the part of the essay which really caught my eye. The lesson here is just as Michael suggests: buying the "hot" item is not necesarily a bad thing. What is detrimental is over-weighting the potential prospects of the investment based on current hype and recent short-term performance. With regard to our uncertain REIT investment, clearly it was a good performer for a short time but the mistake was buying it as a "partner" in the investment. Once we were in, we were in for the whole deal. No exit. And that is the first of the two most important lessons Mrs Bluecollar and I have learned from the big recession of the past 18 months. There is no substitute for liquidity of investment, which relies on an open and active market. Secondly, if it's hot now, probablility dictates a reversion to the mean and the smart money will be getting out soon; taking us back to Lesson One above.
-
Proper weighting of evidence in making investment decisions
Jul 27
Posted by Reaper in All Categories, Statistics, Very Important Posts No Comments
This is a classic trading post from my investment blog GoodeValue.com.
This article should not surprise you, but I think it important to emphasize points I have made earlier about the predictable irrationality of investors. I recently came across a paper written by Dale Griffin and Amos Tversky, entitled The Weighing Of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence (no full-text version available online). This article gives evidence as to why investors ignore regression to the mean and why they do not pay attention to the reliability of certain kinds of financial information.
The research behind the article is not brilliant nor even very interesting. What is exciting is the theory that Griffin and Tversky put forth. They also review relevant prior research. It is best to start with their theory.
Their theory is that people pay too much attention to the strength or extremity of evidence and not enough attention to its weight or reliability. They do not put forth a theory as to why people do this, but such a theory does not matter to us. What is important is what this theory predicts and how we can use it to predict how other investors will behave so that we may profit from it. One of the most important predictions of this theory is that people will be overconfident when information strength is high and information weight is low but they will be underconfident when weight is high and strength is low.
What do I mean by information weight and strength? The strength of information would be its extremity. For example, when hiring from among a pool of job applicants, a job interview that goes very poorly is strongly negative information. Information weight is the reliability of the information. A 20 minute job interview is not a reliable indicator of a potential employee’s demeanor and character and thus can be characterized as low-weight information.
The simplest test of this theory involves having people guess about a spinning coin. Unbeknownst to most, coins that are spun will tend to land on either one side or the other, due to imperfections in the manufacture of said coins. Griffin and Tversky told their subjects about a series of coins. They gave their subjects results of coin spinning experiments that varied in both the strength of evidence (the percentage of spins that landed on either side) and the weight of that evidence (the number of times the coin had been spun). Subjects had to guess whether the coin was weighted towards heads or tails. Subjects also had to give their confidence for each decision they made. Keep in mind that even if a coin lands on head 60% of the time, it would not be implausible for it to wind up on heads four out of 10 times or 10 out of 20 times, due to random error.
If people were perfectly logical, their confidence would increase as a function of both the strength of the evidence (the percentage of heads) and the weight of the evidence (the number of spins). There is a way to calculate the statistically correct inference and the confidence one can have in that inference given a certain weight and strength. This can be done by using Bayes’ theorem, which I will mercifully avoid describing here. While it would not be reasonable to expect people to always draw the statistically correct conclusion, it would be reasonable for them to be consistent. That was not the case.
In fact, the researchers’ theory was confirmed: given strong evidence with little weight (e.g., a coin that lands on heads 80% of the time, after five spins), people tend to be overconfident. Given weak evidence with a high weight (e.g., a coin that lands on heads 60% of the time, after 17 spins), people tend to be less confident than they should be. Overall, the researchers found that people relied over twice as much on the strength of the information as they did on its weight.
What does this mean for us as investors? First, if we pick our stocks using our intuitive judgment, we are at risk of becoming overconfident in our stock picking when our decision is heavily influenced by strong information of low weight (low reliability). A good example of this would be the novice investor’s choice to invest in a company primarily because he likes their product. Unless that investor is an expert in that type of product, such information is rarely useful. Conversely, we are at risk of being underconfident in our stock picking when the evidence is rather weak but highly reliable. I think Wal-Mart WMT is a great example of an investment with weak but reliable information in its favor: its PE ratio is average, its recent growth has been steady but unremarkable, and its brand name is well-known. These pieces of information are all highly reliable, but they indicate that Wal-Mart is a pretty good investment, not a great investment.
Oftentimes, conflicting information about a company will be of different strengths and weights. Whether by using a quantitative investment method or by just being aware of how much weight you should give to each piece of information, you must always consider the reliability or weight you should put on a piece of information when you are making investment decisions.
Besides the implications for costs and our personal investment decisions, this research has important implications for us because other investors will make these mistakes. They will not pay enough attention to the reliability of information (its weight). This will lead to consistent mispricing of stocks. This explains why value stocks outperform growth stocks: investors put too much weight in unreliable estimates of future growth, which leads them to bid up the price of growth stocks too high.
Other consistent inefficiencies in the market are also likely caused by investors not paying enough attention to the reliability of information. Companies in exciting sectors or industries are valued more highly (have higher PE ratios) than companies in less exciting industries, despite evidence that hot sectors do not outperform the market and may under-perform the market as a whole. While some might say that investors buying into the latest hot sector are just being stupid, I would argue that they are just over-weighting the importance of the industry’s future and under-weighting the importance of value (as measured by the PE ratio).
There are probably other stock market inefficiencies that this can explain. One anomaly that this explains is the success of stock promoters. The rubes who buy promoted stocks (Spongetech comes to mind) pay attention to the extreme positivity of press releases and newsletter while ignoring the low reliability of such sources.
Disclosure: I have no position in WMT. I have a disclosure policy. This article was originally written three years ago and published elsewhere. I have a disclosure policy.
Friday, August 7, 2009
August 7th- No Trades
No trades today. Day job just finished around 3:30 and I had only about 7 minutes of watching the market action. I got my "fix" before the weekend, even if it was only 7 minutes!
-
I think it has been a few weeks, so I'll mention again how much I hate my day-job. If there is a more powerful motivation for me to trade successfully, I don't know what it is yet.
-
I think it has been a few weeks, so I'll mention again how much I hate my day-job. If there is a more powerful motivation for me to trade successfully, I don't know what it is yet.
Thursday, August 6, 2009
August 6th
Selling and buying, buying and selling. My brain is burnt today for some reason. Can't think after staring at the monitors most of the day, even with a sushi break for lunch compliments of a buddy.
More of the same today... some pretty good entries but some premature exits. I was thinking ahead today... looking for potential places to get back in as soon as I exited.
I am very happy that I am getting better at beating my desire to add to losing positions.
I'm sticking mostly to my practice account for now as I acclimate to the new trading style.
-
6 for 7 winners, an 86% win rate. Gain of $165 in 4.5 hours of paper-trading.
great insight...
For those still learning as I am, great insight into momentum trading via "reading the tape" can be found in yeterday's list of posts by Scott at FNG. His 2nd post of the day at 9:20 am and the discussion between he and CN in the comments section of the post are worth a read if you haven't already. It gets you a look into a highly-trained trading mind. It shows why trading is such a difficult thing to master; the same signal can mean many different things in different contexts.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29610017&postID=1744627143642038504
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29610017&postID=1744627143642038504
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
August 5th
I must go out to a day-job appt so I'll post and leave. A bit of summary to follow later. I went from the doldrums today to finishing on a high note. Some days, training for stock trading is a mental roller-coaster. I can only hope there will be a day where it is no more than just a boring session at work. My dream... my goal.
Addendum:
Made one stupid move without really thinking about what I've learned... I bought AIG long at the hod in an extended, over-bought condition after a huge rush of volume (all signals of probable reversal). I did this by going to the chart for the first time of the day, seeing the run it had and getting "gold fever," and counting on a continuation. All these decisions in about 5-10 seconds. No thought whatsoever... just looked at the price chart and clicked buy... like I said, stupid. I held onto the trade and dumped it for $20 loss as it retested the hod a while later.
Toward end of day, I got my wits about me and started to use some of what I've learned. I added to a long position in SKF once it showed momo; did this at the same price of the original entry made earlier and got some extra gains as it went up. I did sell too soon per usual, on this trade and the following trade; both had nice entries but I had no sense of an exit designed to maximize profit. I think the answer is to use the same signals which make for good entries as a means of identifying good exits then wait for the turn to take place to get out(?)... it's hard to say for sure. I'm still trying to figure it out.
I took a small bite out of AIG at 3:40-ish as it was rising. Picked up 16 cents gain there, again selling too early missing an additional 32 cent rise in the move.
-
5 for 7, a 71 % win rate. gain of $136 in 6.5 hours of paper-trading.
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
August 4th
I was able to watch the market early in the session and was prepared to take a trade in my live account if something caught my eye. As has been the case lately, I tend to want to watch closely rather than participate. After a short notice day-job call which took me out of the office through the mid-day, I got back and signed into the practice account. By 1:30, it appeared that the top had been reached in VMC and the retreat was in force. I went short at 49.88 and when the position was positive for 8 cents, I doubled up short on the winner. It retraced a bit so I decided to exit my extra position and stick with the original a bit more. I exited at $49.78. All together, I took 8 cents from it. The kicker is that I did, in fact, peg the top in VMC and my short position was at the early stage of a drop which continued down to $49.37. It rose ftom that point to $49.84 (not touching my entry point of $49.88) and then eased down to $49.16 over the next 50 minutes or so.
My instincts told me I had a good entry, my only trade all day to that point. And, I didn't stick with it, instead getting out early with the quick scalp. Using the $49.84 average position I had short minus the $49.37 bottom of the move I was trading, I had 47 cents available to me. Of that 47 cents, I took 8 cents; only 17%. This is a theme with me. Decent entries on many occasions but no sense of where to exit so I just get out whenever... That really needs work.
The last trade was in VMC, playing the reversal off the nice move up into the close. I took it short at 49.57 and exited with a scalp of about 6 cents. Of that retreat I played, I got pretty much all available to me once I entered. It was never to be anything but a quick in & out as there were only about 4 minutes left in the day when I went in.
-
3 for 3, 100% win rate. Gain of $56 in about 3.5 hours of paper-trading.
Monday, August 3, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)